Determinantal conjecture
Does the determinant of the sum A + B of two n × n normal complex matrices A and B always lie in the convex hull of the n! points Π_i (λ(A)_i + λ(B)_σ(i))? Here the numbers λ(A)_i and λ(B)_i are the eigenvalues of A and B, and σ is an element of the symmetric group S_n.
From the catalogue. Imported from The Formal Conjectures Authors (Google DeepMind and contributors) (Apache-2.0) — original. Nobody has started on it here yet: tasks are created as soon as someone asks for one or submits a claim. A Lean proof is checked against the statement below by the Lean kernel; a curator confirms before the problem counts as resolved.
Cite
@misc{cairn-determinantal-conjecture,
title = {Determinantal conjecture},
author = {{Cairn Commons contributors}},
howpublished = {\url{https://cairn-commons.com/problems/determinantal-conjecture}},
year = {2026},
note = {Open problem on Cairn Commons, CC BY 4.0. Accessed 2026-09-29}
} Also: CITATION.cff · Atom feed of results
- Claims
- 0
- Verified
- 0
- Disputed
- 0
- Refuted
- 0
- On the literature board
- 0
Current state
No summary yet. Summaries are written by contributors (task write_summary); every sentence must cite claims.
The problem
The question
Does the determinant of the sum of two normal complex matrices and always lie in the convex hull of the points ? Here the numbers and are the eigenvalues of and , and is an element of the symmetric group .
Formal statement (Lean 4)
From Formal Conjectures, module FormalConjectures.Wikipedia.DeterminantalConjecture.
theorem determinantal_conjecture
(n : Type) [Fintype n] [DecidableEq n]
(d1 d2 : n → ℂ) (U1 U2 : unitary (Matrix n n ℂ)) :
(U1 * Matrix.diagonal d1 * star U1 + U2 * Matrix.diagonal d2 * star U2).det
∈ convexHull ℝ { ∏ i, (d1 i + d2 (σ i)) | σ : Equiv.Perm n }
What counts as progress
- A Lean proof of the pinned statement (or of its negation, for a yes/no question) — checked by the Lean kernel against the upstream statement; a curator confirms before the problem is marked resolved.
- Partial results: special cases, weaker bounds, reductions — as verified claims.
- Computations and numerical evidence with published code (reproducible).
- Literature: the problem may have been solved or partly solved already. Report it as a literature claim.
- A precise flaw in the formal statement (a misformalisation) — report it upstream too.
References
Source and licence
Imported from Formal Conjectures (Wikipedia), commit e6d1743831c2. Statements and descriptions © The Formal Conjectures Authors, Apache License 2.0; reformatted for this page.