Skip to content
Level B · Reproducible Algebra P-constant-76a-asymptotic-line-count-constant-for-smooth-degree-d-surfaces-in-p-3

Asymptotic line-count constant for smooth degree-d surfaces in ℙ^3 in characteristic 0

For each integer d ≥ 3, let ℓ_0(d) denote the maximal number of lines contained in a smooth surface of degree d in ℙ^3_ℂ. We define C_76 := limsup_d→∞ℓ_0(d)/d^2. The constant C_76 measures the quadratic growth rate of the maximal line count on smooth complex degree-d surfaces.

From the catalogue. Imported from Terence Tao and contributors (optimizationproblems repository) (Apache-2.0) — original. Nobody has started on it here yet: tasks are created as soon as someone asks for one or submits a claim.

Start working on it Submit a claim Follow
Cite
@misc{cairn-constant-76a-asymptotic-line-count-constant-for-smooth-degree-d-surfaces-in-p-3,
  title        = {Asymptotic line-count constant for smooth degree-d surfaces in ℙ^3 in characteristic 0},
  author       = {{Cairn Commons contributors}},
  howpublished = {\url{https://cairn-commons.com/problems/constant-76a-asymptotic-line-count-constant-for-smooth-degree-d-surfaces-in-p-3}},
  year         = {2026},
  note         = {Open problem on Cairn Commons, CC BY 4.0. Accessed 2026-09-29}
}

Also: CITATION.cff · Atom feed of results

Claims
0
Verified
0
Disputed
0
Refuted
0
On the literature board
0

Current state

No summary yet. Summaries are written by contributors (task write_summary); every sentence must cite claims.

The problem

Description of constant

For each integer , let denote the maximal number of lines contained in a smooth surface of degree in .

We define

The constant measures the quadratic growth rate of the maximal line count on smooth complex degree- surfaces. The problem is open; the best established range is <a href="#BS2007-lb-3d2">[BS2007-lb-3d2]</a> <a href="#BR2023-ub-11d2">[BR2023-ub-11d2]</a>

The current best general upper bound is due to Bauer and Rams, while a standard infinite lower-bound family comes from surfaces of the form , which give at least lines for every . <a href="#BR2023-ub-11d2">[BR2023-ub-11d2]</a> <a href="#BS2007-lb-3d2">[BS2007-lb-3d2]</a>

Bauer and Rams also note that the exact fixed-degree maximum remains unknown for every . <a href="#BR2023-ub-11d2">[BR2023-ub-11d2]</a>

Known upper bounds

BoundReferenceComments
<a href="#BR2023">[BR2023]</a>Historical Clebsch bound, recorded in Bauer–Rams; it already implies . <a href="#BR2023-ub-clebsch">[BR2023-ub-clebsch]</a>
<a href="#BR2023">[BR2023]</a>Segre’s classical improvement; as summarized by Bauer–Rams, this was the best general bound for smooth complex degree- surfaces with until 2023. <a href="#BR2023-quintic-segre">[BR2023-quintic-segre]</a>
<a href="#BR2023">[BR2023]</a>Current best general upper bound in characteristic , valid for . <a href="#BR2023-ub-11d2">[BR2023-ub-11d2]</a>

Known lower bounds

BoundReferenceComments
<a href="#BS2007">[BS2007]</a>Achieved by the classical family ; within that family the exact count is except for the finitely many exceptional degrees . Therefore . <a href="#BS2007-lb-3d2">[BS2007-lb-3d2]</a>

Additional comments and links

  • Classical-family ceiling. Boissière and Sarti show that the two classical constructions they analyze—surfaces and cyclic -covers of branched over a smooth plane curve—do not exceed the threshold. <a href="#BS2007-classical-cap">[BS2007-classical-cap]</a>
  • Sporadic fixed-degree improvements. They also construct a symmetric octic with lines. Thus specific degrees can substantially outperform the baseline value coming from the standard infinite family. <a href="#BS2007-octic-352">[BS2007-octic-352]</a> <a href="#BS2007-lb-3d2">[BS2007-lb-3d2]</a>
  • Fixed-degree open problems. Even in degree one currently only has the bound , and Bauer–Rams emphasize that the exact fixed-degree maximum is still open for every . <a href="#BR2023-quintic-segre">[BR2023-quintic-segre]</a> <a href="#BR2023-ub-11d2">[BR2023-ub-11d2]</a>
  • Why characteristic is built into the definition. Page, Ryan, and Smith prove that for smooth degree- surfaces with over algebraically closed fields, one has , with equality attained precisely in positive characteristic for certain Fermat surfaces with . Along this infinite family, , so removing the characteristic- hypothesis would make the corresponding limsup infinite. <a href="#PRS2024-maximal-lines">[PRS2024-maximal-lines]</a>

References

  • <a id="BR2023"></a>[BR2023] Bauer, Thomas; Rams, Sławomir. Counting lines on projective surfaces. Annali Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa - Classe di Scienze (5) 24 (2023), no. 3, 1285–1299. DOI: 10.2422/2036-2145.202111_010. arXiv PDF: 1902.05133v2. Google Scholar
  • <a id="BR2023-quintic-segre"></a>[BR2023-quintic-segre] loc: arXiv v2 PDF p.1, §1 Introduction, file 1902.05133v2.pdf quote: “By contrast, the maximal number of lines on smooth hypersurfaces in of a fixed degree remains unknown (see [18], [3], [12], [6]). In the case of smooth quintic surfaces the proof of the inequality can be found in the recent paper [16], whereas (until now) the best bound for smooth complex surfaces of degree has been the inequality that was stated by Segre in [18, § 4].”
  • <a id="BR2023-ub-11d2"></a>[BR2023-ub-11d2] loc: arXiv v2 PDF p.2, §1 Introduction (Theorem 1.1), file 1902.05133v2.pdf quote: “Theorem 1.1. Let be a smooth surface of degree over a field of characteristic or of characteristic . Let be the number of lines that the surface contains. Then the following inequality holds . This result provides the lowest known bound on the number of lines lying on a degree- surface for . Still, the question what is the maximal number of lines on smooth projective surfaces of a fixed degree remains open.”
  • <a id="BR2023-ub-clebsch"></a>[BR2023-ub-clebsch] loc: arXiv v2 PDF p.2, §1 Introduction, file 1902.05133v2.pdf quote: “The first bound on the number of lines on a smooth degree- surface was stated by Clebsch: ([4, p. 106]), who used ideas coming from Salmon ([4, p. 95], [17]).”
  • <a id="BS2007"></a>[BS2007] Boissière, Samuel; Sarti, Alessandra. Counting lines on surfaces. Annali Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa - Classe di Scienze (5) 6 (2007), no. 1, 39–52. DOI: 10.2422/2036-2145.2007.1.03. arXiv PDF: math/0606100v1. Google Scholar
  • <a id="BS2007-lb-3d2"></a>[BS2007-lb-3d2] loc: arXiv v1 PDF p.2, §1 Introduction (statement of Proposition 3.3), file math/0606100v1.pdf quote: “Proposition 3.3 The maximal numbers of lines on are: • for , ; • , , , , .”
  • <a id="BS2007-classical-cap"></a>[BS2007-classical-cap] loc: arXiv v1 PDF p.11, §4 (Proposition 4.2), file math/0606100v1.pdf quote: “Then contains exactly lines. In particular, it contains no more than lines.”
  • <a id="BS2007-octic-352"></a>[BS2007-octic-352] loc: arXiv v1 PDF p.1, Abstract, file math/0606100v1.pdf quote: “We obtain in particular a symmetric octic with 352 lines.”
  • <a id="PRS2024"></a>[PRS2024] Page, Janet; Ryan, Tim; Smith, Karen E. Smooth Surfaces with Maximal Lines. Preprint (2024). DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2406.15868. arXiv PDF: 2406.15868v2. Google Scholar
  • <a id="PRS2024-maximal-lines"></a>[PRS2024-maximal-lines] loc: arXiv v2 PDF p.1, Abstract and Theorem 1.1, file 2406.15868v2.pdf quote: “Theorem 1.1. Let be a smooth algebraic surface of degree over an algebraically closed field . Then contains at most lines. Furthermore, contains exactly lines if and only if (i) has characteristic ; (ii) for some ; and (iii) is projectively equivalent to the Fermat surface defined by .”

What counts as progress

  • A better upper or lower bound, with a proof or a construction whose value is re-computed by published code (reproducible), ideally with a certificate a deterministic checker can validate.
  • A formal proof (Lean) of a known bound, or a precise error in a claimed one.
  • New references for the tables above (literature claims).

Source and licence

Imported from the crowdsourced repository of optimization constants (Terence Tao and contributors), commit 2c1968cd520b, Apache License 2.0; reformatted for this page. New records should also be reported there.