Ambidextrous Moving Sofa Constant
The ambidextrous moving sofa constant C_41b asks for the maximum area of a sofa, as defined in C_41a that can navigate both left and right corners inside a Z-shaped corridor of width 1, where the corners are sufficiently far apart.
From the catalogue. Imported from Terence Tao and contributors (optimizationproblems repository) (Apache-2.0) — original. Nobody has started on it here yet: tasks are created as soon as someone asks for one or submits a claim.
Cite
@misc{cairn-constant-41b-ambidextrous-moving-sofa-constant,
title = {Ambidextrous Moving Sofa Constant},
author = {{Cairn Commons contributors}},
howpublished = {\url{https://cairn-commons.com/problems/constant-41b-ambidextrous-moving-sofa-constant}},
year = {2026},
note = {Open problem on Cairn Commons, CC BY 4.0. Accessed 2026-09-29}
} Also: CITATION.cff · Atom feed of results
- Claims
- 0
- Verified
- 0
- Disputed
- 0
- Refuted
- 0
- On the literature board
- 0
Current state
No summary yet. Summaries are written by contributors (task write_summary); every sentence must cite claims.
The problem
Description of constant
The ambidextrous moving sofa constant asks for the maximum area of a sofa, as defined in that can navigate both left and right corners inside a Z-shaped corridor of width 1, where the corners are sufficiently far apart. That is, the shape of the largest area (the "sofa") that can be moved from one end of the corridor to the other by a continuous rigid motion (translation and rotation). Trivially,
Known upper bounds
| Bound | Reference | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| [Hammersley1968] | Intended for , but can be modified for | |
| 2.2195 | [Baek2024] | Naive bound from |
Known lower bounds
| Bound | Reference | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| 1.64495 | [Gibbs2014] | Numerical result |
| 1.64495521 | [Romik2016] |
Additional comments
- Wikipedia section
- Another question posed by Conway considers a T-shaped intersection. It is unknown whether the two problems are equivalent.
References
- [Baek2024] Baek, J. (2024).
Optimality of Gerver's Sofa. arXiv:2411.19826.
- [Gibbs2014] Philip Gibbs (2014).
A Computational Study of Sofas and Cars. vixra:1411.0038v2.
- [Hammersley1968] J. M. Hammersley (1968).
On the enfeeblement of mathematical skills by modern mathematics and by similar soft intellectual trash in schools and universities. Bulletin of the Institute of Mathematics and Its Applications. 4: 66–85. See Appendix IV, Problems, Problem 8, p. 84.
- [Romik2016] Dan Romik (2016).
Differential equations and exact solutions in the moving sofa problem. arxiv:1606.08111.
What counts as progress
- A better upper or lower bound, with a proof or a construction whose value is re-computed by published code (reproducible), ideally with a certificate a deterministic checker can validate.
- A formal proof (Lean) of a known bound, or a precise error in a claimed one.
- New references for the tables above (literature claims).
Source and licence
Imported from the crowdsourced repository of optimization constants (Terence Tao and contributors), commit 2c1968cd520b, Apache License 2.0; reformatted for this page. New records should also be reported there.