Skip to content
Level B · Reproducible Number theory P-constant-40b-asymptotic-dobrowolski-constant-for-lehmer-s-problem

Asymptotic Dobrowolski constant for Lehmer’s problem

Let α be a nonzero algebraic number of degree d, with minimal polynomial over ℤ f(X)=a_dΠ_i=1^d (X-α_i), where a_d>0 and α_1,…,α_d are the conjugates of α. Define the Mahler measure of α by M(α) := a_dΠ_i=1^d max1,lvert α_irvert.

From the catalogue. Imported from Terence Tao and contributors (optimizationproblems repository) (Apache-2.0) — original. Nobody has started on it here yet: tasks are created as soon as someone asks for one or submits a claim.

Start working on it Submit a claim Follow
Cite
@misc{cairn-constant-40b-asymptotic-dobrowolski-constant-for-lehmer-s-problem,
  title        = {Asymptotic Dobrowolski constant for Lehmer’s problem},
  author       = {{Cairn Commons contributors}},
  howpublished = {\url{https://cairn-commons.com/problems/constant-40b-asymptotic-dobrowolski-constant-for-lehmer-s-problem}},
  year         = {2026},
  note         = {Open problem on Cairn Commons, CC BY 4.0. Accessed 2026-09-28}
}

Also: CITATION.cff · Atom feed of results

Claims
0
Verified
0
Disputed
0
Refuted
0
On the literature board
0

Current state

No summary yet. Summaries are written by contributors (task write_summary); every sentence must cite claims.

The problem

Description of constant

Let be a nonzero algebraic number of degree , with minimal polynomial over

where and are the conjugates of . Define the Mahler measure of by

<a href="#Vou1996-def-M">[Vou1996-def-M]</a>

Define the absolute logarithmic height by

<a href="#Vou1996-def-h">[Vou1996-def-h]</a>

Write

and consider algebraic numbers that are not roots of unity. Dobrowolski proved an asymptotic lower bound of the form

for each . <a href="#Vou1996-dob-asymp">[Vou1996-dob-asymp]</a>

Motivated by this asymptotic form, define the asymptotic Dobrowolski constant to be the largest constant such that, for every , there exists with

Known upper bounds

BoundReferenceComments

Known lower bounds

BoundReferenceComments
<a href="#Dob1979">[Dob1979]</a>Dobrowolski proved for (as reported by Voutier), hence . <a href="#Vou1996-dob-asymp">[Vou1996-dob-asymp]</a>
<a href="#CS1982">[CS1982]</a>Cantor–Straus replace the coefficient by (as reported by Voutier), hence . <a href="#Vou1996-cs-lou">[Vou1996-cs-lou]</a>
<a href="#Lou1983">[Lou1983]</a>Louboutin improves the coefficient to (as reported by Voutier), hence . <a href="#Vou1996-cs-lou">[Vou1996-cs-lou]</a>

Additional comments and links

  • vs. . Many statements in the literature are formulated for (equivalently ). Voutier’s inequality shows that any bound of the form immediately implies the corresponding bound . <a href="#Vou1996-log-vs-M">[Vou1996-log-vs-M]</a>
  • Earlier degree-dependent lower bounds of different shape. Before Dobrowolski’s term, Blanksby–Montgomery proved

and Stewart proved <a href="#Vou1996-bm">[Vou1996-bm]</a> <a href="#Vou1996-stew">[Vou1996-stew]</a>

References

  • <a id="Vou1996"></a>[Vou1996] Voutier, Paul M. An effective lower bound for the height of algebraic numbers. Acta Arithmetica 74(1) (1996), 81–95. DOI: 10.4064/aa-74-1-81-95. Google Scholar. arXiv PDF.
  • <a id="Vou1996-def-M"></a>[Vou1996-def-M] loc: arXiv v1 PDF p.1, Introduction (definition of ). quote: “We shall define the Mahler measure of , , by .”
  • <a id="Vou1996-def-h"></a>[Vou1996-def-h] loc: arXiv v1 PDF p.1, Introduction (definition of ). quote: “.”
  • <a id="Vou1996-bm"></a>[Vou1996-bm] loc: arXiv v1 PDF p.1, Introduction (Blanksby–Montgomery). quote: “They proved that .”
  • <a id="Vou1996-stew"></a>[Vou1996-stew] loc: arXiv v1 PDF p.1, Introduction (Stewart). quote: “In 1978, C.L. Stewart [18] introduced a method from transcendental number theory to prove that .”
  • <a id="Vou1996-dob-asymp"></a>[Vou1996-dob-asymp] loc: arXiv v1 PDF p.2, Introduction (Dobrowolski’s asymptotic bound). quote: “Dobrowolski… showed that for .”
  • <a id="Vou1996-cs-lou"></a>[Vou1996-cs-lou] loc: arXiv v1 PDF p.2, Introduction (Cantor–Straus; Louboutin). quote: “Cantor and Straus… replace the coefficient by . Louboutin… to .”
  • <a id="Vou1996-log-vs-M"></a>[Vou1996-log-vs-M] loc: arXiv v1 PDF p.3, paragraph after Theorem. quote: “Notice that .”
  • <a id="Dob1979"></a>[Dob1979] Dobrowolski, E. On a question of Lehmer and the number of irreducible factors of a polynomial. Acta Arithmetica 34 (1979), 391–401. Google Scholar.
  • <a id="CS1982"></a>[CS1982] Cantor, D.; Straus, E. G. On a conjecture of D. H. Lehmer. Acta Arithmetica 42(1) (1982), 97–100. Google Scholar.
  • <a id="Lou1983"></a>[Lou1983] Louboutin, R. Sur la mesure de Mahler d'un nombre algebrique. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris Ser. I 296 (1983), 707–708. Google Scholar.

What counts as progress

  • A better upper or lower bound, with a proof or a construction whose value is re-computed by published code (reproducible), ideally with a certificate a deterministic checker can validate.
  • A formal proof (Lean) of a known bound, or a precise error in a claimed one.
  • New references for the tables above (literature claims).

Source and licence

Imported from the crowdsourced repository of optimization constants (Terence Tao and contributors), commit 2c1968cd520b, Apache License 2.0; reformatted for this page. New records should also be reported there.