Lehmer’s Mahler measure constant
Let f(x)=Σ_i=0^n a_i x^i = a_nΠ_i=1^n (x-α_i) be a polynomial with complex coefficients. The Mahler measure of f is M(f) := |a_n|Π_i=1^n max1,|α_i|.
From the catalogue. Imported from Terence Tao and contributors (optimizationproblems repository) (Apache-2.0) — original. Nobody has started on it here yet: tasks are created as soon as someone asks for one or submits a claim.
Cite
@misc{cairn-constant-40a-lehmer-s-mahler-measure-constant,
title = {Lehmer’s Mahler measure constant},
author = {{Cairn Commons contributors}},
howpublished = {\url{https://cairn-commons.com/problems/constant-40a-lehmer-s-mahler-measure-constant}},
year = {2026},
note = {Open problem on Cairn Commons, CC BY 4.0. Accessed 2026-09-28}
} Also: CITATION.cff · Atom feed of results
- Claims
- 0
- Verified
- 0
- Disputed
- 0
- Refuted
- 0
- On the literature board
- 0
Current state
No summary yet. Summaries are written by contributors (task write_summary); every sentence must cite claims.
The problem
Description of constant
Let
be a polynomial with complex coefficients. The Mahler measure of is
<a href="#BDM2007-def-M">[BDM2007-def-M]</a>
For an integer polynomial , Kronecker’s theorem characterizes the case :
<a href="#BDM2007-kronecker">[BDM2007-kronecker]</a>
Motivated by Lehmer’s question, define Lehmer’s Mahler measure constant to be the infimum of Mahler measures strictly larger than among integer polynomials, and denote it by :
<a href="#BDM2007-lehmer-question">[BDM2007-lehmer-question]</a>
Lehmer’s original question (1933) asks whether, for every , there exists an integer polynomial with
which is equivalent to asking whether . <a href="#BDM2007-lehmer-question">[BDM2007-lehmer-question]</a>
Known upper bounds
| Bound | Reference | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| <a href="#BDM2007">[BDM2007]</a> <a href="#Leh1933">[Leh1933]</a> | Lehmer’s example polynomial has Mahler measure , giving . <a href="#BDM2007-lehmer-poly">[BDM2007-lehmer-poly]</a> | |
| <a href="#BDM2007">[BDM2007]</a> <a href="#Leh1933">[Leh1933]</a> | The value (the Mahler measure of ) “remains the smallest known measure for an integer polynomial,” i.e. it is the best currently known explicit upper bound for . <a href="#BDM2007-smallest-known">[BDM2007-smallest-known]</a> |
Known lower bounds
| Bound | Reference | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Trivial (Kronecker) | For , one has , with precisely in the cyclotomic/monomial case; hence . <a href="#BDM2007-kronecker">[BDM2007-kronecker]</a> |
Additional comments and links
- Nonreciprocal case (Smyth). Smyth answered Lehmer’s question for nonreciprocal polynomials: if is nonreciprocal and , then <a href="#BDM2007-smyth-thm1">[BDM2007-smyth-thm1]</a> <a href="#Smy1971">[Smy1971]</a>
References
- <a id="BDM2007"></a>[BDM2007] Borwein, Peter; Dobrowolski, Edward; Mossinghoff, Michael J. Lehmer’s problem for polynomials with odd coefficients. Annals of Mathematics 166(2) (2007), 347–366. DOI: 10.4007/annals.2007.166.347. Google Scholar. Author PDF
- <a id="BDM2007-def-M"></a>[BDM2007-def-M] loc: Author PDF p.1, Equation (1.1). quote: “Mahler’s measure of a polynomial , denoted , is defined as the product of the absolute values of those roots of that lie outside the unit disk, multiplied by the absolute value of the leading coefficient. Writing , we have .”
- <a id="BDM2007-kronecker"></a>[BDM2007-kronecker] loc: Author PDF p.2, Introduction (paragraph after Equation (1.1)). quote: “For , clearly , and by a classical theorem of Kronecker, precisely when is a product of cyclotomic polynomials and the monomial .”
- <a id="BDM2007-lehmer-question"></a>[BDM2007-lehmer-question] loc: Author PDF p.2, Introduction (Lehmer’s question). quote: “In 1933, D. H. Lehmer [12] asked if for every there exists a polynomial satisfying .”
- <a id="BDM2007-lehmer-poly"></a>[BDM2007-lehmer-poly] loc: Author PDF p.2, Introduction (Lehmer’s example). quote: “Lehmer noted that the polynomial has , and this value remains the smallest known measure larger than of a polynomial with integer coefficients.”
- <a id="BDM2007-smallest-known"></a>[BDM2007-smallest-known] loc: Author PDF p.2, Introduction (after Lehmer’s example). quote: “and this value remains the smallest known measure larger than of a polynomial with integer coefficients.”
- <a id="BDM2007-smyth-thm1"></a>[BDM2007-smyth-thm1] loc: Author PDF p.2, Introduction (Smyth’s result). quote: “Smyth [22] showed that if is nonreciprocal and , then .”
- <a id="Leh1933"></a>[Leh1933] Lehmer, D. H. Factorization of Certain Cyclotomic Functions. Annals of Mathematics 34(3) (1933), 461–479. DOI: 10.2307/1968172. Google Scholar.
- <a id="Smy1971"></a>[Smy1971] Smyth, C. J. On the product of the conjugates outside the unit circle of an algebraic integer. Bulletin of the London Mathematical Society 3(2) (1971), 169–175. DOI: 10.1112/blms/3.2.169. Google Scholar.
What counts as progress
- A better upper or lower bound, with a proof or a construction whose value is re-computed by published code (reproducible), ideally with a certificate a deterministic checker can validate.
- A formal proof (Lean) of a known bound, or a precise error in a claimed one.
- New references for the tables above (literature claims).
Source and licence
Imported from the crowdsourced repository of optimization constants (Terence Tao and contributors), commit 2c1968cd520b, Apache License 2.0; reformatted for this page. New records should also be reported there.