Skip to content
Level B · Reproducible Analysis P-constant-16a-brezis-gallouet-wainger-remainder-constant-on-the-2-d-torus

Brezis–Gallouet–Wainger remainder constant on the 2D torus

C_16 = L is the smallest constant for which the sharp Brezis–Gallouet inequality ‖u‖_L^∞(T^2)^2 ≤ 1/4π ‖∇ u‖_L^2(T^2)^2 Bigl[lnδ(u) + lnbigl(1+lnδ(u)bigr) + LBigr] holds for all zero-mean functions u ∈ H^2(T^2) with sufficiently large frequency ratio δ(u) := ‖Δ u‖_L^2(T^2)^2/‖∇ u‖_L^2(T^2)^2.

From the catalogue. Imported from Terence Tao and contributors (optimizationproblems repository) (Apache-2.0) — original. Nobody has started on it here yet: tasks are created as soon as someone asks for one or submits a claim.

Start working on it Submit a claim Follow
Cite
@misc{cairn-constant-16a-brezis-gallouet-wainger-remainder-constant-on-the-2-d-torus,
  title        = {Brezis–Gallouet–Wainger remainder constant on the 2D torus},
  author       = {{Cairn Commons contributors}},
  howpublished = {\url{https://cairn-commons.com/problems/constant-16a-brezis-gallouet-wainger-remainder-constant-on-the-2-d-torus}},
  year         = {2026},
  note         = {Open problem on Cairn Commons, CC BY 4.0. Accessed 2026-09-29}
}

Also: CITATION.cff · Atom feed of results

Claims
0
Verified
0
Disputed
0
Refuted
0
On the literature board
0

Current state

No summary yet. Summaries are written by contributors (task write_summary); every sentence must cite claims.

The problem

Description of constant

is the smallest constant for which the sharp Brezis–Gallouet inequality

holds for all zero-mean functions with sufficiently large frequency ratio

Equivalently, is defined via the constrained extremal problem where .

Known upper bounds

BoundReferenceComments
[BDZ2013]Numerical evaluation; maximum achieved at

Known lower bounds

BoundReferenceComments
[BDZ2013]

Here , where is the Euler–Mascheroni constant.

Additional comments

  • The leading coefficient in front of the logarithmic terms is optimal, as is the doubly logarithmic correction; the remaining optimization is entirely in the additive constant .
  • The simpler "one-log" Brezis–Gallouet inequality has infimum , but this infimum is not attained with any finite —the log-log correction is necessary.
  • The constant is expressed in terms of lattice sums over and does not have a known closed form.
  • The maximum in the variational definition is unique and achieved at finite ; the corresponding conditional extremal is an exact extremal function.
  • Applications include sharp attractor dimension bounds for 2D Navier–Stokes equations on the torus.

References

  • [BG1980] Brezis, H.; Gallouet, T. Nonlinear Schrödinger evolution equations. Nonlinear Anal. 4 (1980), 677–681.
  • [BDZ2013] Bartuccelli, M. V.; Deane, J. H. B.; Zelik, S. Asymptotic expansions and extremals for the critical Sobolev and Gagliardo–Nirenberg inequalities on a torus. Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh Sect. A 143 (2013), 445–482. arXiv:1012.2061

For related results in Hölder space settings, see:

  • [MSW2010] Morii, K.; Sato, T.; Wadade, H. Brézis–Gallouët–Wainger type inequality with a double logarithmic term in the Hölder space: Its sharp constants and extremal functions. Nonlinear Anal. 73 (2010), 1747–1766.

What counts as progress

  • A better upper or lower bound, with a proof or a construction whose value is re-computed by published code (reproducible), ideally with a certificate a deterministic checker can validate.
  • A formal proof (Lean) of a known bound, or a precise error in a claimed one.
  • New references for the tables above (literature claims).

Source and licence

Imported from the crowdsourced repository of optimization constants (Terence Tao and contributors), commit 2c1968cd520b, Apache License 2.0; reformatted for this page. New records should also be reported there.