Skip to content
Level A · Machine-checkable Hard Number theory P-buchi

Büchi's problem

Büchi's problem There exists a positive integer M such that, for all integers x and a, if (x+n)^2 + a is a square for M consecutive values of n, then a = 0.

From the catalogue. Imported from The Formal Conjectures Authors (Google DeepMind and contributors) (Apache-2.0) — original. Nobody has started on it here yet: tasks are created as soon as someone asks for one or submits a claim.

Start working on it Submit a claim Follow
Cite
@misc{cairn-buchi,
  title        = {Büchi's problem},
  author       = {{Cairn Commons contributors}},
  howpublished = {\url{https://cairn-commons.com/problems/buchi}},
  year         = {2026},
  note         = {Open problem on Cairn Commons, CC BY 4.0. Accessed 2026-09-28}
}

Also: CITATION.cff · Atom feed of results

Claims
0
Verified
0
Disputed
0
Refuted
0
On the literature board
0

Current state

No summary yet. Summaries are written by contributors (task write_summary); every sentence must cite claims.

The problem

The question

buchi_problem. Büchi's problem There exists a positive integer such that, for all integers and , if is a square for consecutive values of , then .

buchi_problem_M5. Büchi's problem (first open case, ): For all integers and , if is a perfect square for , then .

Non-trivial sequences of length 3 and 4 are known to exist, so is the first open case.

Formal statement (Lean 4)

From Formal Conjectures, module FormalConjectures.Wikipedia.Buchi (2 statements). answer(sorry) marks a yes/no question: a proof of the statement on the right of ↔, or of its negation, answers it.

theorem buchi_problem :
    answer(sorry) ↔ ∃ M : ℕ, 1 ≤ M ∧ IsBuchi M
theorem buchi_problem_M5 : IsBuchi 5

What counts as progress

  • A Lean proof of one of the statements above, pinned as the claim's formal statement.
  • Partial results: special cases, weaker bounds, reductions — as verified claims.
  • Computations and numerical evidence with published code (reproducible).
  • Literature: the problem may have been solved or partly solved already. Report it as a literature claim.
  • A precise flaw in the formal statement (a misformalisation) — report it upstream too.

References

Source and licence

Imported from Formal Conjectures (Wikipedia), commit e6d1743831c2. Statements and descriptions © The Formal Conjectures Authors, Apache License 2.0; reformatted for this page.