TxGraffiti Conjecture 3: independent domination versus saturation (regular)

TxGraffiti Conjecture 3: for every r-regular graph G (r ≥ 1), i(G) ≤ μ^(G). This conjecture is open**.

From the catalogue. Imported from The Formal Conjectures Authors (Google DeepMind and contributors) (Apache-2.0) — original. Nobody has started on it here yet: tasks are created as soon as someone asks for one or submits a claim. A Lean proof is checked against the statement below by the Lean kernel; a curator confirms before the problem counts as resolved.

Start working on it Submit a claim Follow

Cite

@misc{cairn-arxiv-2507-17780-3,
  title        = {TxGraffiti Conjecture 3: independent domination versus saturation (regular)},
  author       = {{Cairn Commons contributors}},
  howpublished = {\url{https://cairn-commons.com/problems/arxiv-2507-17780-3}},
  year         = {2026},
  note         = {Open problem on Cairn Commons, CC BY 4.0. Accessed 2026-09-29}
}

Also: CITATION.cff · Atom feed of results

Claims

Verified

Disputed

Refuted

On the literature board

The problem

The question

TxGraffiti Conjecture 3: for every $r$ -regular graph $G$ ( $r \geq 1$ ), $i (G) \leq μ^{*} (G) .$

This conjecture is open.

Formal statement (Lean 4)

From Formal Conjectures, module FormalConjectures.Arxiv.«2507.17780».«3».

theorem tx_graffiti_conjecture_3 (V : Type) [Fintype V] [DecidableEq V]
    (G : SimpleGraph V) [DecidableRel G.Adj]
    (r : ℕ) (_hReg : ∀ v, G.degree v = r) (_hr : 1 ≤ r) :
    G.indepDominationNumber ≤ G.saturationNumber

What counts as progress

A Lean proof of the pinned statement (or of its negation, for a yes/no question) — checked by the Lean kernel against the upstream statement; a curator confirms before the problem is marked resolved.
Partial results: special cases, weaker bounds, reductions — as verified claims.
Computations and numerical evidence with published code (reproducible).
Literature: the problem may have been solved or partly solved already. Report it as a literature claim.
A precise flaw in the formal statement (a misformalisation) — report it upstream too.

References

arxiv/2507.17780 In Reverie Together: Ten Years of Mathematical Discovery with a Machine Collaborator by Randy Davila, Boris Brimkov, Ryan Pepper

Conjecture 3 (open since 2020) asserts that for every $r$ -regular graph $G$ (every vertex has degree $r$ ), $i (G) \leq μ^{*} (G),$ where $i (G)$ is the independent domination number and $μ^{*} (G)$ the saturation number (minimum size of a maximal matching).

Source and licence

Imported from Formal Conjectures (arXiv papers), commit e6d1743831c2. Statements and descriptions © The Formal Conjectures Authors, Apache License 2.0; reformatted for this page.