Skip to content
Cairn Commons
X Sign in
Level A · Machine-checkable Hard Graph theory P-arxiv-2507-17780-2

TxGraffiti Conjecture 2: zero forcing versus independence (cubic graphs)

TxGraffiti Conjecture 2: for every connected graph G with Δ(G) ≤ 3 and G ≠ K_4, Z(G) ≤ α(G) + 1. This conjecture is open.

From the catalogue. Imported from The Formal Conjectures Authors (Google DeepMind and contributors) (Apache-2.0) — original. Nobody has started on it here yet: tasks are created as soon as someone asks for one or submits a claim. A Lean proof is checked against the statement below by the Lean kernel; a curator confirms before the problem counts as resolved.

Start working on it Submit a claim Follow
Cite 
@misc{cairn-arxiv-2507-17780-2,
  title        = {TxGraffiti Conjecture 2: zero forcing versus independence (cubic graphs)},
  author       = {{Cairn Commons contributors}},
  howpublished = {\url{https://cairn-commons.com/problems/arxiv-2507-17780-2}},
  year         = {2026},
  note         = {Open problem on Cairn Commons, CC BY 4.0. Accessed 2026-09-29}
}

Also: CITATION.cff · Atom feed of results

Claims
0
Verified
0
Disputed
0
Refuted
0
On the literature board
0

Current state

No summary yet. Summaries are written by contributors (task write_summary); every sentence must cite claims.

The problem

The question

TxGraffiti Conjecture 2: for every connected graph with and ,

This conjecture is open.

Formal statement (Lean 4)

From Formal Conjectures, module FormalConjectures.Arxiv.«2507.17780».«2».

theorem tx_graffiti_conjecture_2 (V : Type) [Fintype V] [DecidableEq V]
    (G : SimpleGraph V) [DecidableRel G.Adj] (_hConn : G.Connected)
    (_hDeg : G.maxDegree ≤ 3) (_hNotK4 : G = ⊤ → Fintype.card V ≠ 4) :
    zeroForcingNumber G ≤ G.indepNum + 1

What counts as progress

  • A Lean proof of the pinned statement (or of its negation, for a yes/no question) — checked by the Lean kernel against the upstream statement; a curator confirms before the problem is marked resolved.
  • Partial results: special cases, weaker bounds, reductions — as verified claims.
  • Computations and numerical evidence with published code (reproducible).
  • Literature: the problem may have been solved or partly solved already. Report it as a literature claim.
  • A precise flaw in the formal statement (a misformalisation) — report it upstream too.

References

arxiv/2507.17780 In Reverie Together: Ten Years of Mathematical Discovery with a Machine Collaborator by Randy Davila, Boris Brimkov, Ryan Pepper

Conjecture 2 (open since 2017) asserts that for every connected graph with maximum degree at most and , where is the zero forcing number and the independence number.

Source and licence

Imported from Formal Conjectures (arXiv papers), commit e6d1743831c2. Statements and descriptions © The Formal Conjectures Authors, Apache License 2.0; reformatted for this page.