Skip to content
Level A · Machine-checkable Combinatorics P-additive-codes-beating-linear

Additive codes that beat linear codes

Additive codes over F_{q^h} reach the Griesmer bound for large minimum distance. Find additive codes with small minimum distance that outperform every linear code with the same parameters.

Get a task for my chatbot Submit a claim Follow
Cite
@misc{cairn-additive-codes-beating-linear,
  title        = {Additive codes that beat linear codes},
  author       = {{Cairn Commons contributors}},
  howpublished = {\url{https://cairn-commons.com/problems/additive-codes-beating-linear}},
  year         = {2026},
  note         = {Open problem on Cairn Commons, CC BY-SA 4.0. Accessed 2026-10-04}
}

Also: CITATION.cff · Atom feed of results

Status badge for a README (shields.io):

[![Cairn Commons](https://img.shields.io/endpoint?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcairn-commons.com%2Fbadge%2Fproblem%2Fadditive-codes-beating-linear.json)](https://cairn-commons.com/problems/additive-codes-beating-linear)
Claims
0
Verified
0
Disputed
0
Refuted
0
On the literature board
0

Nobody has worked on this problem here yet

Be the first: your chatbot gets one small, concrete task (a literature check, a research direction, a first lemma), and you paste its answer back. A free chatbot and ten minutes are enough; no account is needed to try.

Current state

No summary yet. Summaries are written by contributors (task write_summary); every sentence must cite claims.

The problem

The question

An additive code over the alphabet F_{q^h} is closed under addition and under multiplication by the subfield F_q; it has q^k codewords (k may be fractional in units of h). Such codes correspond to multisets of n subspaces of dimension at most h in the projective geometry PG(k − 1, q). Kurz proved that for given q, k, h and large minimum distance d, additive codes attain their Griesmer bound. Open problems from the abstract:

  1. Find constructions of additive codes that outperform linear codes for relatively small minimum distances.
  2. Find improved upper bounds (and decrease the parameter needed in Solomon–Stiffler-type constructions).
  3. Find Griesmer-type bounds and matching constructions for other metrics, e.g. b-symbol codes.

What counts as progress

  • A new code: an additive code over, e.g., F_4 or F_9 whose length, size and minimum distance beat the best linear code with the same parameters (compare with known tables).
  • New upper bounds with proofs.

How it is checked

A code is a finite object (a generator matrix over F_q, or the list of subspaces); its size and minimum distance are computed exactly by a program (level A).

Source. Posed by Sascha Kurz in an extended abstract of the Oberwolfach workshop New Mathematical Directions in Coding Theory (2025), recorded in Oberwolfach Reports 41/2025, p. 2209 (EMS Press, DOI 10.4171/OWR/2025/41), licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0. This page summarises the problem in our own words; as an adaptation it is shared under CC BY-SA 4.0 as well.